Saturday, January 26, 2013

Active Listening


This blog pretty much centers around  the concept that health and healing can't be separated from relationship; relationship being the container that holds all healing and therapeutic collaboration.  This idea of relationship depends on a deeper listening, also called Active Listening or Therapeutic Listening.  There are several versions of what this is.  There is an actual teaching structure to learn:  ActiveListening.  There is another version that includes an awareness of body language.  In addition, my own  sense of this includes individual and collective energy awareness.

The problem with spelling-out and structuring something as natural as listening, is the danger that the structure and learning of it becomes mechanical.  It doesn't take into account the unknown moments and energy cues, the subtle energy exchanges that can't be qualified nor quantified.  Mechanical is the antithesis of what Listening is. Most of these teaching models do emphasize cultivating "awareness", awareness being mentioned as an almost aside in the methods. But awareness seems to be the crux of listening (and hence, the center of most understanding); awareness is dimensional and requires a commitment to engage more of oneself.  Most of these methods include sounding back word for word what another person has said.  This is helpful for the other person (they hear their own words back and know they've been received) and it's helpful for the "hearing" person as well.  That particular "parroting" tactic if primarily used in an attempt to listen, can be (in my experience) trying especially if it is done automatically and mechanically.  Nevertheless, it is not a bad first step in relating.

Like most things, one can be instructed to learn listening skills.  Also, as in most things, a foundation in skills involving knowledge is partial until an understanding ensues.  An understanding transpires with a lot of practice.  A practice which not only includes the foundational skills, but a building of attention, awareness, humility and patience.  And also importantly, a curiosity.  Curiosity is an imperative part of the process because, once curiosity is absent to another's manifestation (or your own in the engagement), humility goes out the window and judgement moves in.  At this point, the delicate, multi-dimensional act of listening becomes something else closer to reaction.

Active listening isn't something we do with our hearing organ (ears) alone.  It includes all of me.  It actually means to have an active attention, something none of the skill-building methods mention.  Probably because an active attention is challenging to cultivate and involves parts of oneself that are new to that activity.  How do we become practiced in awareness?  How do we build a layered and more acute attention?

All practice starts with oneself.  The Active Listening literature calls for allowing for silences and empty space in exchanges.  So it is with oneself.  Many people cultivate this through meditation, taking time to sit quietly, which activates other more subtle parts of oneself that become witness to what goes on when one is sitting still, sensitizing, breathing more fully.  These more subtle parts don't get a chance to be "practiced" unless these quiet moments are allowed.  They don't come forth readily without that room being made ready, the presence of a more expansive and spacious territory that often is accompanied by acceptance and empathy.  Meditation and a relationship to our own nature is not a cultural more in this country (although may be becoming so).  If it was culturally more "usual", perhaps these practices would be built into our lives and our neighbor's lives.  But they are not, so instigating it in oneself can be a struggle without a community's support.

Another aspect of a deeper listening which is not mentioned in Active Listening literature is the fact that listening is a dual action.  It's an attention on oneself as well as on another.  Practicing being with oneself while taking in tone, words and general energy of another is tricky.  It's a bit like riding a wave.  You're with yourself one moment, than in the next moment, find you have dipped down into the wave's tunnel (lapsed attention), in danger of  becoming attached to something the person you are listening to has said or indicated energy-wise or in body language.  It's a dance of energetically moving back and forth, finding the alignment between oneself and another.  And to further complicate things, there are always the inevitable distractions.  Other noises and movement present as well as the reactions that occur in oneself and the other.  It's usual to be taken by all or any of these things.  Our bodies are lightning rods to energy sources, extremely sensitive to the smallest manifestation.  Listening becomes complex.  Attention is tenuous.  This practice is dependent on the renewing of the curiosity place in oneself, the place that is interested and intrigued by the small and opaque, by the contrasts and paradoxes without getting caught up or attached to them.


Because listening is complicated and layered, to try listening experiments with inanimate objects or animals before intentionally taking on other human beings can be helpful.  Sitting quietly with objects or pets and watching/listening to the play of energy, thoughts, associations going on within oneself and the thing's response, simplifies the listening experience.  Feeling into the life and nature of the thing that is more simple than human beings, gives us a chance to experience this deeper listening in ourselves, to ourselves and to another.  Exploring a sensitized energy exchange in this circumstance is helpful in building a stronger awareness, attention and listening capacity in oneself.

To practice "listening" with and to inanimate objects might seem an eccentric thing to attempt.  But everything has materiality and all materiality has energy and therefore its own truth.  Doing this sort of exercise with say, a door knob, is revealing.  The door knob has an energy of its own and has been influenced by people energies (touch).  From a sensitized place, its materiality speaks (subtle) volumes, its energy is noteworthy.  Giving an object a quiet attention creates an interesting relationship to it; the nuanced "listening" factor revealed.

Therapeutic Listening - A Total Approach
Power to Change – 10 Tips to Effective & Active Listening Skills
Active Listening
- Steps and Instructions

The Center for Nonviolent Communication | Center for Nonviolent .

 


Wednesday, January 23, 2013

The "Care" Effect

I have spent a considerable amount of my nursing career studying, accumulating information, practicing and  experiencing healing philosophy and giving statistical based lectures about the power and efficacy of alternative and complimentary medicine.  Research and statistics backed me up.  One such statistic  was: $34 billion dollars is spent annually out of pocket on treatments and non conventional approaches.  As I espoused these statistics to interested health professionals (I thought they were interested-- otherwise why would they take the trouble to come and hear a talk on this?) I could see these facts, wash over their high-browed craniums like an air current over the body of a soaring plane.  Very seldom did I see little pocket of air form within them expand as the information was delivered. Which made me think, their interest wasn't so much in these soft medicine facts and treatments as much as the money that wasn't reaching their pockets.  Then I thought I wasn't presenting well, it was too much "other" information, which although was factually undeniable, was unfamiliar.  They couldn't relate, even though I took great pains to give them statistics and research which were immediately relateable (dollar and cents).  As medical professionals, we are told it's all about evidence-base.  But obviously not, as they weren't assimilating it.  Finally, I decided the stars were not aligned, corporate medicine wasn't ready to take the leap to move toward including these practices, despite the facts.


To be fair, this information on alternative and complimentary medicine has been heard, but in corporate medicine terms.  Integrative medicine centers, associated with major medical institutions, have been formed, in fact it's a big trend at the moment. These centers obviously need financing, and they often get this through donors with deep pockets.  Their continued growth and success is also obviously necessary, so revenue generation is required.  They figured out how to get insurance to pay for treatments (ie: MD provided acupuncture, MD provided health coaching, packaged lifestyle behavior modification classes as prescription). Ok. So, we're moving along, right?

The issue I take in the current approach of integrating conventional with alternative medicine is that it is construed from the old model of practicing medicine.  It's based on Descartes's original and ever present philosophy that we can be deduced down to separable parts and the ill parts can be managed as they need to be, not in relation to the entire person.  This isn't Whole thinking, an approach based on Oneness.  Complimentary, alternative, integrative medicine becomes a "specialty" and is worked into an outdated paradigm that hasn't been effective for almost forever, has always been hugely expensive and ultimately becomes a tepid healing (because it is not based on relationship).

In his article, Forget the Placebo Effect: It's the 'Care Effect' That Matters   Nathanael Johnson makes a case for a soft medicine approach, stating research that shows kindness and a deeper listening skill used by practitioners is actually extremely effective in promoting best outcomes.  What Descartes discounted was the power of trust and relationship in healing.  He was all about promoting curing and hard facts of using a fully scientific approach (in his time, excluding church/religion/spirituality as a useful influence).  And in 15-20% of illness, he's spot on.  If you have a broken leg, saying prayers over it probably won't fix it, a good surgeon would be useful.  However, the rate of healing of this broken leg may vary depending on soft medicine interventions.  Using the science knowledge of positive attitude, mobilizing the parasympathetic nervous system to off-set the sympathetic in the crisis of the trauma gets our blood cells working optimally, reduces "emergency" hormones coursing through the body (an obstacle to healing) and makes us generally feel a lot better than taking pills dealing with anxiety and even pain.  Hippocrates had a more whole healing perspective, an example of a well rounded physician.  Probably Descartes was alive at a time of great political upheaval and was able to establish the model we practice today. Today, we train a lot of doctors in this country and extremely few of them become physicians (whole healers).


In 80-85% of all illness (chronic in nature) a non-conventional approach is mandatory for there to be a healing.  Because medicine has become so militarized and corporate, we are embedded in systems and bureaucracy that aren't meant to budge easily.  There is little flexibility, not much innovation (outside of technology) in approaching what has become the business of health.  The hierarchy is ever present:  hard science is best, soft medicine is tolerated and not really seen as an ever important adjunct to the full and effective treatment of human beings. Respect for knowledge is assumed.  Respect for relationship is (generally) not important.  It is this that is at the base of all healing, it is this that must be cultivated in medicine today.  Of course knowledge and skill are vital.  But without an empathic presence, a fuller present intelligence, a greater skill at listening, knowledge and talent are marginal in the forum of healing.  These skills make our healers (doctors, nurses, therapists) whole in service to others and (great empathy and deep listening) is also in its nature, a reciprocal action, a healing of oneself.

"The 'care effect'—the idea that the opportunity for patients to feel heard and cared for can improve their health. Scientific or no, alternative practitioners tend to express empathy, to allow for unhurried silences, and to ask what meaning patients make of their pain. Kaptchuk's study was a breakthrough:  It showed that randomized, controlled trials could measure the effect of caring. But there was already abundant evidence from nursing science to suggest a healing power in the interaction between practitioner and patient."*

Can this "care effect" proliferate in the old paradigm?  The old paradigm being a corporate compliance-based entity with iron-clad legal implications at every turn?  Nurses, as indicated in the quote above have seen and implemented this "care effect" through the ages but in the old paradigm model, have continually seen it tie their hands as restrictions and standard measurements of care become narrower and more prevalent.  They are expected to ever increase their "caring" while also being required to take on more and more responsibilities (same for MDs as well).  It is unrealistic.  It is not looking at either the whole nurse/doctor or the whole patient and probably the whole system.  Caring becomes a commodity in an uncaring, sometimes hostile environment.  This is not an environment or system that can sustain true empathy nor deep listening.  This is not a paradigm that can provide truly integrative services. This paradigm is broken.

Caring and empathy is a deep part of our humanity.  When it begins to be measured in "accountability" terms like a bookkeeper's numbers, we begin to have a problem that soon turns to dysfunction.  Healing is an often mysterious, varied and flexible process that was never meant for Descartes's small pigeon-hole formula.  We have to take a risk that a new paradigm can sustain an excellence and affordability in healthcare.  We have to have a more empathetic and fluid paradigm to work from.  That paradigm is currently unknown, which is a scary prospect for the millions of people who depend upon a working healthcare model.  But otherwise, we are putting a square peg in a round hole and trying to make it fit.  The body itself might have lessons for us to glean in how to develop a new paradigm.  The fact that the Central Nervous System has these different and varied aspects (sympathetic and parasympathetic) that work together to help us to be whole, is possibly something akin to developing a paradigm that can do the same for our healthcare delivery.  Something to ponder.

*Forget the Placebo Effect: It's the 'Care Effect' That Matters | Wired ...

Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Shared History

“The cosmos is within us, we’re made of star stuff.  We are a way for the cosmos to know itself.” --Carl Sagan

We have a profoundly deep relationship with the cosmos we inhabit.  Literally.  It is a 3.5 billion year shared history, a mutuality, a related existence, a symbiotic occupation.  Our DNA, cells, organs have a relationship with fish and pools of algae, as well as rocks, and are related to the grand "othernesses" of the cosmos at large.  These 'outer' thing's stories are our own brilliant truths.  The things that shape our bodies are the things that have shaped this planet and the entire universe.

Farish Jenkins and Neil Shubin, decades-long colleagues, explored the zoologist and paleontologist/ evolutionary biologist's point of view in finding the relationship to our ancestors (the fish and rocks).  As they have found, we have a shared history. "The sun burns hydrogen. Others stars burn oxygen and carbon.  The fundamental atoms that make our hands, feet, and brains serve as the fuel for stars.  It isn't merely the atoms in our bodies that extend across the far reaches of the universe: molecules that make our bodies are found in space. The building blocks for the proteins and larger molecules that make us--amino acids and nitrates--rain down to Earth in meteorites and lie in the rocky crust of Mars or on the moons of Jupiter.  If our chemical cousins are in the stars, meteors and other heavenly bodies, then clues to our deepest connections to the universe must lie in the sky above our heads."*  These are extraordinary suppositions.  As Sagan indicates above, the cosmos needs to know itself and the universe is its playground to do so.  That each of us and all matter would resonate with the energy of 
itself and other both makes sense and is simultaneously mind boggling.  When we have the occasion to admit we are but grains of sand in a vast desert is also to admit that we are surprisingly unique (see photo image) and related in that uniqueness.

Wholeness; the thrust of our inner and outer cosmology.  This fact is, in all this relatedness which Jenkins and Shubin speak about.  How is it possible we are able to evade this truth on an ongoing and unrelenting basis?  That we speak and act from a lack of relationship to almost anything and everything.  It is so astounding, it almost feels like a joke is being played on humankind.  'You will be placed on this planet in a universe that is made of a complete and perfect cosmological order, but it will appear like it is in utter and complete havoc, practically at all times.  Confusion and misperceptions will reign.  And you will have a time of making sense of it.' And we make sense of it by grappling with the effort of gaining as much control (and power) over what is possible, assuaging the buried terror we have of not understanding, not knowing, not being in relatedness.  It's a good joke, right?!

“Learn how to see.  Realize that everything connects to everything else.” 
 --Leonardo da Vinci

This is not a new concept nor from one scholar's point of view.  This actually is common knowledge (science, art, math, philosophy to mention a few disciplines that have heralded this).  Then, why does it sound so fresh and new and borderline shocking?  Possibly, we are usually so invested in separateness and individuality.  Possibly, we don't view things on a large scale, but from our minuscule point of view, our built in limitedness.  Possibly, it's a frightening notion, our minds can't wrap around it, know it or allow it to impact our being.  I've recognized at times when a huge schema comes along, it can't be received because it is so "other".  It just doesn't fit into our normal understanding of how things work.  What could it mean to include this type of information into our daily life?  How do we/could we integrate it?  How would this mega-relatedness factor impact me if I could take it in?

"Imagine what it would be like if there was no sense of otherness when you were with other people [or material objects]. How would it feel if there was no trace of self-consciousness, and no preoccupation with superiority, competition, fear, mistrust, or unworthiness? Dare to consider, just for a moment, the possibility of being so at ease in the company of others that there was nothing to hide, nothing to defendonly the fear-less transparency of egoless awareness and the ecstatic urgency of the evolutionary impulse. That is what it feels like when we awaken to the Authentic Self, together."

--Andrew Cohen, shared by Richard Siebels 19 August 2012




Talks and Publications by Neil Shubin
In a two-part video (part I and part II), Shubin discusses the planning and research that lead up to the discovery of Tiktaalik.

His book, Your Inner Fish, explores the connection between paleontology—in particular, the anatomy of fossil life forms—and present day human anatomy. It delves into the subject of how humans are shaped by their ancestors and what it means for who we are today.




Thursday, January 10, 2013

Trojan Wurst III: Organic



We live in a world driven by trends.  Organic food (and product) has been one such trend in this country. There are proponents and antagonists in relation to the organic movement; and these factions are militant to their respective points of view.  I hope to put forth some data in this post for clarification on both sides of this issue.

Some antagonists (let's call them "A" camp) state that these trends show a marketing triumph over science reality.  Also, that science evidence is usurped by the philosophy of organic practice.  See:

No Health Benefits from Organic Food

What does this mean?  Let’s look at the practices.

The word "organic" refers to the way farmers grow and process agricultural products. Organic farming practices are designed to encourage soil and water conservation and reduce pollution. Farmers who grow organic produce and meat don't use conventional methods to fertilize, control weeds or prevent livestock disease. For example, rather than using chemical weedkillers, organic farmers may conduct more sophisticated crop rotations and spread mulch or manure to keep weeds at bay.

Here are some key differences in these farming methods:
Conventional
Organic
Apply chemical fertilizers to promote plant growth.
Apply natural fertilizers, such as manure or compost, to feed soil and plants.
Spray synthetic insecticides to reduce pests and disease.
Spray pesticides from natural sources; use beneficial insects and birds, mating disruption or traps to reduce pests and disease.
Use synthetic herbicides to manage weeds.
Use environmentally-generated plant-killing compounds; rotate crops, till, hand weed or mulch to manage weeds.
Give animals antibiotics, growth hormones and medications to prevent disease and spur growth.
Give animals organic feed and allow them access to the outdoors. Use preventive measures — such as rotational grazing, a balanced diet and clean housing — to help minimize disease.

Of all the reading I did for this post, the polarized factions could only agree on seemingly one thing: Organic agriculture's most relative contribution is that it’s about the relationship of farming to the social and biological environment as a whole, not just to one's immediate biology (the food itself). Aside from antibiotic resistant bacteria, this is in regards to broad ecological impacts of pesticide use, soil quality, erosion and runoff, eutrophication of bodies of water, social and economic consequences of the scale of farming, fossil fuel consumption, air pollution, substitution of capital for labor. Whether that particular head of broccoli has as many vitamins as the next one is not the issue (says the A camp).

The "O" (organic) camp claims organic strawberries look and taste better, have higher levels of vitamin C and other antioxidants, are larger and have a longer shelf life before going bad. http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.
1371/journal.pone.0012346*.  (My personal experience is organic strawberries are a lot smaller, much more flavorful and have an extremely short shelf life -- like a day, two days max.  But the flavor! worth their seeming delicate naturalness).  The O-camp also say organic vegetables generally contain higher amounts of minerals and weigh more than conventionally grown ones, organically produced animal meats contain more polyunsaturated fatty acids, and 94-100% of organic grown foods do not contain any pesticide residues.  “Ecological and agronomic research on the effect of fertilization on plant composition shows that increasing availability of plant available nitrogen reduces the accumulation of defense-related secondary metabolites and vitamin C, while the contents of secondary metabolites such as carotenes that are not involved in defense against diseases and pests may increase.  A meta-analysis of the published comparisons of the content of secondary metabolites and vitamins in organically and conventionally produced fruits and vegetables showed that in organic produce the content of secondary metabolites is 12% higher than in corresponding conventional samples ( P< 0.0001)."*  Agroecosystem Management and Nutritional Quality of Plant Foods: The Case of Organic Fruits and Vegetables (www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07352689.2011.554417).  This site includes a meta-analysis of the published comparisons of the content of secondary metabolites and vitamins in organically and conventionally produced fruits and vegetables and a computer modeled benefit outcome on antibiotic resistance in bacteria.

I include here some of the literature I looked at. In this reading, I became almost more interested in how the research and evidence based inquiry was done and reported, more than the subject matter.  It was like looking at most political discourses; there were almost always two camps with opposite opinions and opposite findings.  There was pointing of fingers in regards to primary investigators on a research study (ie:  "Illegitimate! the author works for Big Tobacco").  Transparency seemed to be no where near an objective.  See ** below. Both factions have an obvious incentive to slant the results of whatever study toward their own bias. (http://www.cornucopia.org/2012/09/stanfords-spin-on-organics-allegedly-
There are apparently many flaws in the way studies evaluate their data. For example:
- The (A camp's) nutritional analysis appears to favor specific nutrients that were found in similar levels in both conventional and organics, and ignores nutrients that occur in higher levels in organics. Studies of conventional versus organic nutrient levels have been done, and according to at least one published survey of these studies (http://www.ncl.ac.uk/afrd/research/publication/168871), organic produce contain about an average of 12% more nutrients than conventional produce. See also: 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/13/stanford-organics-study-public-health_n_1880441.html
- The amounts of pesticides and other harmful chemicals in the food were not considered in the analysis. Both organic and conventional foods have these (organic in trace amounts), and naturally conventional foods have much higher levels. But in the analysis the amount and number of kinds of pesticide found was not factored in; only whether or not any pesticide at all was found. See (http://www.motherjones.com/tom-philpott/2012/09/five-ways-stanford-study-underestimates-organic-food)
- The comparative percents of conventional versus organic foods containing pesticides was also misrepresented; the report states that conventional food is 30% more likely to contain them. But the numbers in the details of the report show that 7% of organic foods sampled contained pesticides compared to 38% of the conventional foods. That’s a factor of more than FIVE times greater chance of conventional food containing the pesticides, not to mention that they are in much higher levels on conventional products compared to their organic counterparts.
Rodale web published an article entitled: "Lower Taxes! And 4 Other Surprising Reasons to Save the Earth by Going Organic" (attention grabbing!). Another aspect of organic that is less obvious. They say organic is tax saving because:

"Chemical farming kills jobs. Another perk of organic farming? Labor inputs are 15 percent higher, compared to chemical farms, writes Rodale in Organic Manifesto, which means the organic sector creates more jobs. Many farmers are talked into using agrichemicals because they're told it will make their jobs easier by saving labor—which means fewer farm jobs. But the fact of the matter is, the use of these chemicals is creating "superweeds" that are starting to outwit chemical pesticides.
• There's an experiment going on…and all of us are the guinea pigs. GMOs, or genetically modified organisms, have infiltrated every aspect of our food systems, without ever having been evaluated for their effects on human health. Now that some research is being done (in spite of aggressive tactics by agribusiness to prevent all testing), researchers are seeing signs that GMOs cause organ failure, digestive diseases, even accelerated aging. More studies need to be done to understand how GMOs affect human health, but in the meantime, buying organic is the best way to stop being used as a lab rat.
• You can still eat pineapples and bananas. There are good reasons to seek out food that's grown locally—you support your local economy, you cut down on the fossil fuels needed to bring it to your table, you may even be able to talk to the grower find out how it was produced. But giving up, say, bananas or avocados because they can't be grown where you live is not a step many people want to take. Choose organic, though, and you shrink the carbon footprint of your favorite long-distance treat. "Numerous studies have shown that organic is much more critical when it comes to carbon than local," writes Rodale. That's because the production, shipping, and application of chemical fertilizers and pesticides are among the most energy-intensive farming practices. Organic methods bypass all that and, as mentioned, keep greenhouse carbon out of the atmosphere. Organic AND local is the gold standard, but organic food has a smaller carbon footprint than its local but chemically grown counterpart."

Science, research, evidence base-- it all is questionable, even when the "facts" are laid out, seemingly plain as day.  One sleuths for hard facts and everything appears to be hidden behind mirrors and smoke screens.  Where is Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson when you need them?  Where is transparency?

other sources:
**http://www.agronomy-journal.org/index.php? and ”
http://www.naturalnews.com/037108_Stanford_Ingram_Olkin_Big_Tobacco.html
and



Monday, January 7, 2013

Unmentionables: Menses

Through history, “that time of month” has been a source of belittlement by others called all sorts of things by all sorts of people (unknowing, fearful, unfamiliar).  It is beguiling that something that often causes discomfort and pain would be a source of mockery and even disgust by others.  I’ve often seen menses in sort of miraculous terms, an incredible cycle that is as reliable as the sun and moon rising and setting everyday, the tides rolling in and out; a reminder to take good care, step back, slow down. Women’s cycles relate us to all of nature’s cycles.  This is a big thing. Even the experienced discomfort, has possibly been something through the ages that has enabled women to develop enormous strength and endurance and a capacity for introspection in the often enforced quietness of “bearing” the symptoms of their physiology.  Though most of us know in broad terms what goes on biologically during the time of a woman’s menses, I hope in this post to shed a little more light on it, to clarify the science of it and hence a better appreciation for this process which makes possible a continuation of human life on this planet, as well as holistic approaches to ease the monthly passage.

Physiology of menses
“That time of month” is a misnomer, as a woman’s cycle is in a continuous hormonal flux.  “PMS” (premenstrual syndrome) connotes the period prior to menses that includes bloating, headaches and irritability.  As in all hormonal fluxuations, temporary mental deficits (ie: memory, distractability) can be prevalent.  As anyone who has experienced the sometime disconcerting symptoms of hormonal flux through their continuum, navigating life, work and school takes self-patience and forbearance.

The endocrine system is the driver in a woman's menstrual cycle.  Ramped up production of estrogen (builds up the uterine wall in preparation for the possibility of a fertilized egg), then lutien hormone and finally progesterone aid in continuing this kind of miraculous cycle women experience every month.  This is a complex interplay of hormones that alternately surge and reduce in preparation of one stage or another in the cycle.  The dominant follicle in the ovary become a corpus luteum if unfertilized; it's primary function is producing large amounts of progesterone. Under the influence of progesterone, the endometrium (uterine lining) changes to prepare for potential implantation of an embryo to establish a pregnancy. If implantation does not occur within approximately two weeks, the corpus luteum will involute, causing sharp drops in levels of both progesterone and estrogen. These hormone drops cause the uterus to shed its lining and the unfertilized egg.  Hence, menses.

Men and women alike are controlled by the endocrine system's hormone play.  It's a kind of fantastically sublime regulator  When things are working right, it is usually very subtle.  Men (and I know you're reading this) who might have difficulty imagining what women experience in their menstrual cycles, can have a better understanding by relating to their experience to the hormone, insulin.  All humans have insulin coursing through their bodies at all times.  The wonderful intact check and balance system most of us enjoy prevents us from noticing the ups and downs significantly.  But with insulin, when we've eaten too little or too many carbs or concentrated sweets, we often can feel our insulin production wildly shift, trying to normalize.  We can get big highs and big lows, irritability, headaches or exhaustion are primary symptoms of insulin not behaving in its usual stealth manner. Men, if you've had this disenchanting experience, welcome to a woman's relationship to the hormones, estrogen and progesterone (primarily) and our nearly constant world spanning over four decades.

What's a girl to do?  No one has control (or even an awareness most of the time) of what their hormones are doing.  But since we do know the discomfort brought on by one's menstrual cycle is hormone-related, supporting one's optimal endocrine function  would be a positive start to reducing the symptoms.  As we know with insulin, if we take care not to make insulin production go into over drive or shut down, we don't get the labile shifts that cause havoc in the body and which in turn causes the suffering.

Attitude.  Susun Weed is the guru of great attitude when it comes to women's health and cycles.  She's "crunchy" (as in granola-girl crunchy), but even if you don't swing that way, her attitude is empowering and positive.  Her little article: Blood mysteries - Susun Weed - herbal medicine - women's health .. is a refreshing boost toward getting a new attitude to our not-to-be-denied function.  Appreciating instead of resenting this incredible process is an act of self love.  Women in general, need a lot more of that right kind of feeling. And it starts with us.

Diet/Nutrition:  Again, Susun Weed has some great advice in Ten Tips for Women with PMSMany of her suggestions require self care (like making infusions, taking the time to be mindful of additions you might want to make to food or drink, etc).  This in my mind is a woman's saving grace.  Not only does it instill self awareness and introspection, it actually forces us (unless we want to be fully miserable) to take the time our body is asking us to take and make preparations, consider interventions needed, slow down.  It's kind of great we get these reminders.  It's an aspect of our gender that is extremely valuable.  

Because estrogen increases two weeks prior to the mense date, it might be a good idea to not promote a further elevation of estrogen levels by using soy products or other estrogen-enhancing nutrition at that time.  Also, increasing calcium and magnesium in one's diet decreases unwanted symptoms (Susun mentions this in the above article and emphasizes we should get this through foods not supplements).  Drinking lots of water (abates headaches), (or better yet, infusion teas like stinging nettle-high in calcium, supports the adrenals) helps keep us in flow, the pain, cramps, unwanted symptoms on the move.  Listening to the body's needs is singularly important.  Taking time to listen to what the body is asking for goes a long way to knowing yourself and your cycle symptomology.

Exercise/Movement:  Moving your body regulates your body. Movement primes the cells and system (including endocrine), encourages mutuality and cooperation within the organism.  Most women can tell a huge difference in their menstrual symptoms from the months they have a well integrated exercise regimen and the months they don't.  Exercise improves all circulations within our systems, and is a cornerstone in dealing with daily and/or chronic tension (stress). Moving the body in enjoyment and pleasure is key to sustaining healthy periods.

Practical Rest:  Sometimes our periods hammer us into submission.  Why wait to get layed-low?  Be pre-emptive. Get to bed early when you feel it coming on, take naps when you can, lay down and put your feet up (against the wall feels great). And while you are lying there prostrate, possibly groaning, take some nice deep breaths and send your inhales to where it hurts and imagine their removal on the exhales (out the closest exit sight)Working with your breath in this way aids circulation, prevents you from minimizing or holding your breath (never a good idea).  It also empowers you to be your own healer.  The weight and heat of a warming hot water bottle on your pelvis is a comfort.  Almost better is sending the living Qi in your hands right to the areas that are hurting while breathing is hugely beneficial.  Never underestimate your own healing energy. You were made for yourself.
 
 resources: 
Red Moon Herbs ~ We create potent herbal products, focusing on ...
 has wonderful combination herbs for PMS and "moon" days.  great products!

some light reading for those heavy days:
Moon Days is a literary, passionate, and profound collection.Twenty-six writers explore the "silent" parts of women's lives; reawakening our memories of embarrassment and shame and transforming them to wonder, excitement, and laughter.

Amazons in Appalachia by Awiakta

RED by Karen Murphy




The Red Tent: A Novel by Anita Diamant (Aug 21, 2007)

 Menstrual facts gleaned from:  Menstrual cycle - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia





Saturday, January 5, 2013

Giving Receiving


We are in a perpetual state of giving and receiving.  It’s lawful.  What ascends, descends.  What comes around goes around.  Energy is being spent or obtained.  This fluctuation can be beguiling.  The scales of giving and receiving run from minute to wildly large.  It’s easy to forget these transactions are constant.  It is the wise one that recognizes this inner and outer tide and is knowledgeable enough to turn the straw into gold.

The holidays and times of troubling shifts are ideal conditions to inquire, observe and experiment with giving and receiving (energy).  To be in this fuller intelligence, one needs to be more available to the subtle, which means, my cognitive mind is somewhat suspended (in the effort).  My usual thinking brain just gets confused, doesn’t know how to operate in this inquiry, so, best to give it another job--- like recording the details of the observation the larger Intelligence gleans even if ordinary mind doesn’t understand the stimuli.  The larger Intelligence is fast and flexible.  It’s smart; it knows the less important points, the info that can slide, the small, sometimes barely perceptible details that merit an attention.  It is willing to pick up what it doesn’t understand, willing to suspend usual understanding, it’s cousin, “cognition” depends upon.

In trying times, raw energy is prevalent and plentiful.  One’s body almost vibrates with the availability.  It’s challenging to be in the necessary relaxed state, the state that is available for a transformation from raw and frenetic to something a bit finer.  Mostly, in the state of a lot of raw energy, one assimilates it (unconsciously) and it almost always turns negative.  One of the reasons why this happens is the larger Intelligence isn't given the reigns, isn't allowed to be active.  Instead my usual intelligence starts to run things (without enough trust in another intelligence and no designated "job", what's a brain to do?),
and before long she gets confused over the loaded (energetic) stimuli, what it is and what to do with it, as well as the smoke-screen reactions that are part of the confusion.  So, usual intelligence does what she usually does in these circumstances, which is to shut down, minimize, react, whatever is her survival mechanism.  It's what she knows and Intelligence isn't strong enough or had enough experience being in or with this type of energy.  It is an education the at large culture doesn't give us.

So, what is this education in giving and receiving energy?  There is no road map, no curriculum for this; to each his own path.  But all paths seem to include a cultivation of quietness, less tension and an interest in "other" more subtle manifestations of energy.  Also probably, a respect for the healthy suspicion of the status quo, and the outward workings of what is generally regarded as "reality". A beginning of this education often transpires in periods of being in nature.  Nature is slower. Nature is simpler.  It is common for one's energy field to begin to match nature's when one is surrounded by that influence.  One's awareness has less obstacles to surmount in that energetically resonating  petri dish.  Possibly, childhood experiences that are quite natural and even usual still pulsates strongly in a person, won't go away, are often remembered.  This can be the beginning of an adult's education in what is possible when giving and receiving.

This opportunity of abundant raw energy has to be experienced a lot (decades?) before Intelligence begins to note it as an opportunity and the notion of transforming it a glimmer in the back of the eye/I.  Detaching from beliefs that limit the possibilities of transformation is necessary.  Physical beliefs (attachments to symptoms, ideas), moral beliefs of what consciousness is, transcendance, even what being whole (holy) is.  These beliefs anchor us in an outer reality that won't budge in the face of this other reality.  We are fixed.  Becoming unfixed, and fully uncomfortable in the sea of the unknown is mandatory.

In light of this, it is easy to understand why it takes a life time (or a moment after a life time) for probably only a few to experience the incredible phenomenon of human transformation. It is all of our potentials to do so; however, most of us are not conditioned to realize it.  Frequently, the universe provides conditions we have no choice but to participate in, usually kicking and screaming.  This can be a state of grace we are granted, the universe's nudging us to enter the possibility which is our legacy.

Giving and Receiving is the vigiliant practice of this legacy.  A practice without expectation.  A practice only of a consummate interest in what is.  No attachments.  Free.  It is a practice of study, non-action.

Tuesday, January 1, 2013

2012 Post Culmination

Season's greeting!  Following is a handy-dandy group categorization of last year's posts (easy reference).  Thanks for staying tuned in.  Joy and robust health to you in 2013!



Exercise/Movement

Sleep/Rest/Rejuvenation


Physiology/Bodywork/Healing

Misc.
Finding A Healthcare Partner in a Practitioner
Place Travel: Experiencing Culture
Science Set Free:
The Body as Political Forum
Intelligence

If you are looking for specific subject posts (ie anxiety, relationship, etc), you can go to the blog and write the word in and all the posts with that label will line up for you.  handy, eh?