Showing posts with label community. Show all posts
Showing posts with label community. Show all posts

Friday, March 21, 2014

Dualities: The Good, the Bad and the Earthbound

We have this strange, stratified, practically surreal paradox going on in the world at present.  On the one hand there are the power obsessed which range from individuals controlling their own mini-fiefdoms, resisting inclusion insisting on exclusion --to corporations and governments which are doing the same on a more macro scale.  Here, there is an aversion to relationship.  A more authentic relationship would mean, a willingness for an open tolerance that has breath in unoccupied spaces between people or entities and in oneself.  This would require a letting go, a willingness to be insignificant, a leap into the unknown, a relinquishing of personal resources and time.  At present, there is a lot of lieing, collusion, covert plotting/implementation, backdoor deals, conspiratorial setups to manipulate the external facade and the inevitable cover up of same.

This is a universal (cosmically lawful?) contraction of sorts; as opposed to an expansion or period of release witnessed in other eras or periods of time.  As was said, we are seeing this on all scales; from government, world politics to corporate institutions to even our friends and neighbor's conduction of personal affairs.  It's a proliferative, invasive and a toxic reaction to fear of being nothing.  It is a manifestation of a world bereft of a spiritual compass or conscience.  There is a resistance to this seen by other public power brokers.  Through humor, mobilizing masses of people or throwing money at the contraction through media or otherwise, there is an attempt to bring a transparency to the inequitablility.  From my perspective, this is the other side of this deeply troubled coin (even though I am entertained and often grateful for the latter's exposure attempts).  They are polarized to the other side of the coin, and also are unwilling to be insignificant, invisible and without their own wieldy (heady) power.

I am everybody and every time, I always call myself by your name.  --Pablo Neruda

And then we have, on the other hand, the legions of unsung hero(ines).  Those people who are off that power grid, living their life through a deeper guidance, a conscience that manifests in small, often invisible and insignificant ways to the world at large.  The family members who have put their own personal, well planned trajectory on hold to mindfully care for an incapacitated other, be it a family elder or physically/mentally challenged child, young adult.  What is inconsequential to many is significant to them.  Personally insuring the quality of life for a loved one who may never be a person of power in the world (pay back). And this is usually done at great financial expense and an abdication of massive chunks of personal time (never to be recovered).  There is no fanfare and rarely an acknowledgment of this noble endeavor.  It is an often silent, private, hellish (on some levels) navigation, touched by unspoken suffering, without remuneration and always at an exorbitant financial cost (in one way or another).  Prompted by a sense of deep obligation and almost always love, of the agape sort.  These are people who are both well prepared (financially and internally) and unprepared for such a commitment.  But they all take it on regardless because of their innate sense of integrity, justice and conscience.  It's a breathtaking choice of selflessness to make.

Let me embrace thee, sour adversity, for wise men say it is the wisest course.-- Wm. Shakespeare

Is this not a perplexing and unusual juxtaposition of universal energies?  Granted, it is probably not a new juxtaposition.  I think of India, the famous historical power plays/brokers of the past juxtaposed with Mother Theresa's work with lepers, the terminally ill and other outcasts, done mostly under the radar of public notice, the first few decades at least. There are countless vocationists who have dedicated their existence to educating and caring for underserved, unnoticed populations all over the world, for little to no pay.  And the unconscionable power mongering has indeed always gone on, as these other more conscience-centered activities, have too gone on.

Does the world require these two different cosmic energies to co-exist in the world?  The constant friction of these energies may be necessary to keep the planet turning? Or maybe its not the polar forces themselves, but the friction that is created as they inevitably dual while in co-existence.  There is a tremendous energy generated there.  Enough energy to catapult nations into revolution and/or war.  On a micro scale, it's enough for individuals to make a cataclysmic shift in themselves; stop drinking/drugging, take a serious life inventory that prompts a leap into another way of being.  Or is it merely, we are at the mercy of these inevitable paradoxes?  They cosmically do their contraction/expansion thing on cue, and we similarly on cue, do our response/reaction to these big lawful forces?

In a way the inner struggle to cultivate a conscience through a lifetime is related to the universal duality these forces manifest.

This goodly frame, the earth, seems to me a sterile promontory, this most excellent canopy, the air, look you, this brave o'erhanging firmament, this majestical roof fretted with golden fire, why, it appears no other thing to me than a foul and pestilent congregation of vapours. What a piece of work is a man! how noble in reason! how infinite in faculty! in form and moving how express and admirable! in action how like an angel! in apprehension how like a god! the beauty of the world! the paragon of animals! And yet, to me, what is this quintessence of dust?” ― William ShakespeareHamlet



Sunday, March 10, 2013

Welcome to the Anthropocene

"Anthropocene is an informal geologic chronological term that serves to mark the evidence and extent of human activities that have had a significant global impact on the Earth's ecosystems. The term was coined recently by ecologist Eugene F. Stoermer, but has been widely popularized by the Nobel Prize-winning atmospheric chemist, Paul Crutzen, who regards the influence of human behavior on the Earth's atmosphere in recent centuries as so significant as to constitute a new geological epoch for its lithosphere." --Wikipedia

I've been almost halted in my tracks as of late with the perception of the incredible dysfunction and seeming corruption this planet, this world and nation are currently suffering.  Everything appears upside down with a grim trajectory imminent.  With the statistical research having prompted the video Wealth Inequality in America - YouTube  to go viral, pointing out the illusion of the public as to how bad the inequality is and the general consensus of the broad sampling, to be a country unlike its current state. This along with the ongoing, endless polarization and lack of sense (but a lot of maneuvering) exhibited by our government which will only negatively impact the already desperate poor, and the seeming lack of ownership of that responsibility (when one is oppressed, we're all oppressed).  My alarm isn't so much over the chaos (there will always be that) but the ongoing and continual fracture that continues to divide us, the smoke screen that keeps us passive despite a practically unanimous understanding (amongst the diverse sampling in the mentioned research) of what is fair and equitable.  There appears no awareness in the relationship of environment to health to inequality, to prejudice and manipulation; only a frenzied barreling toward divisiveness.  Where is the long view?  Where is the world community awareness?

Freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed.
--MLK  "Letter from Birmingham Jail," April 16, 1963

After looking at the research for the above mentioned video (where from were the statistics gleaned, how was the research carried out, what was the sampling?), I was introduced to some material on Anthropocene and a study being done on alternative business practices created from a larger perspective.
 
"The Anthropocene calls to us to recognize that we are all participants in the ‘becoming world’, where everything is interconnected and learning happens in a stumbling, trial and error sort of way. In the spirit of this participation, many offer the experiment as the only way forward: the only way to approach such a period in which uncertainty is high and one cannot predict what the future holds, is not to predict, but to experiment and act inventively and exuberantly via diverse adventures in living." (Dumanoski 2009, quoting C.S. Holling)


"At the core of J.K. Gibson-Graham’s feminist political imaginary is the vision of a decentralized movement that connects globally dispersed subjects and places through webs of signification. We view these subjects and places both as sites of becoming and as opportunities for belonging. But no longer can we see subjects as simply human and places as human-centered. The ‘arrival’ of the Anthropocene has thrown us onto new terrain. Feminist critiques of hyper-separation are pushing us to move beyond the divisive binaries of human/nonhuman, subject/object, economy/ecology and thinking/ acting. The reframing of our living worlds as vast uncontrolled experiments is inspiring us to reposition ourselves as learners, increasingly open to our interconnections with earth others and more willing to intervene in adventurous ways. In this article we begin to think about more-than-human regional development and regional research collectives that have the potential to perform resilient worlds. For us the project of belonging involves both participating in the vast experiment that is the Anthropocene and connecting deeply to specific places and concerns."

"2013 ingredients of a new world-shaping movement: 1) assemblages that are experimenting with new practices of living and being together, 2) the ubiquity of these assemblages, and 3) the potential global compass of a new discourse of ‘belonging’ linked to a more than-human regional development imaginary. Our working definition of regional development is: how ‘we’ (that is, all the human/nonhuman participants in the becoming world) organize our lives (or how life organizes us) to thrive in porously bounded spaces in which there is some degree of interconnection, a distinctively diverse economy and ecologies, multiple path-dependent trajectories of transformation and inherited forms of rule."

Following are some examples of business practice in relation to this decentralized movement.

"Our first adventure is an experiment in regional development led by individuals and institutions that are motivated in part by an ethic of caring for place and environment. Capturing and democratizing wealth to care for people and environments in place.  The Evergreen Cooperatives are a set of new employee-owned businesses, based on the cooperative model, that hire local residents and contribute to environmental sustainability. In the Greater University Circle of inner city Cleveland, Ohio, investment flows easily into world renowned cultural, educational and health institutions that were originally established by philanthropic industrialists of a past era. Up against these well-endowed institutions are run-down neighborhoods housing some 43,000 residents whose average median household income is under $18,500 per year (Evergreen video 2010). Little of the massive institutional investment in salaries, procurements and real estate development stays within these inner ring neighborhoods. According to Bob Eckhardt (2009), senior vice president of the Cleveland Foundation, each institution acts ‘as if the world ended at its respective property line’. The Cleveland Foundation, established as the ‘world’s first community foundation in 1914, decided in the mid 2000s to concentrate funding and capacity building activities on the Greater University Circle to make sure that ‘as the big institutions grow and prosper, the neighborhood prospers as well’ (Ekhardt 2009). Its mission was to create jobs for local residents in green industries and to generate wealth that would circulate within and help stabilize the neighborhood."

"The Evergreen Cooperative Laundry was the first experiment to get off the ground. It is an ‘industrial-scale, environmentally advanced, state-of-the-art, commercial laundry providing services to area hospitals and assisted living centers’ (Yates 2009). A feasibility study showed that commercial laundries could pay reasonable wages if they were not under pressure to generate profits for owners and shareholders.  Making the employees owners through a cooperative meant that an employee-owned laundry could immediately offer jobs paying a little better than the going rate for such work, offer better benefits and also be a wealth-builder for employees over the years." (Yates 2009, 17) Gender, Place and Culture."


"We draw here on a video report on the rise of peer-to-peer exchanges by the Wall Street Journal’s tech reporter Andy Jordon.  Jordon presents a series of interviews that begin with young corporate executives who trade in Ven, a virtual currency used to ‘buy, share and trade knowledge, goods and services’ (Jordon 2010). Tamara Giltsoff, a sustainable business consultant, is one of the ‘urban influentials’ who are members of Hub Culture, one of many meshworks that have grown out of the social networking capacities of the internet. In selected world cities Hub Culture members flock to Hub Pavilions where they can book space to work, meet, trade non-tangible value and recreate (bookings can be made for a personal chef for 10 or more people, a personal trainer, or a reflexologist/reiki/polarity therapist). Giltsoff describes using Ven: ‘It begins to put a value on intangible exchanges, I guess. I have gained Ven by making introductions to other people or doing favours for people in the network.’ Dan George, a promoter for international music recording stars says: ‘With fluctuating exchange rates you know that if you have a certain amount of Ven you can, sort of, count on it when you are working between countries.’ According to the Hub Culture website (2010): The price of Ven is made up of a weighted basket of currencies, commodities and carbon futures and trades against other major currencies at floating exchange rates. Ven is the first currency to include carbon externalities in its pricing factor, making it the first environmentally linked currency in existence."

I believe that unarmed truth and unconditional love will have the final word in reality. This is why right temporarily defeated is stronger than evil triumphant.  -- MLK,  Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech, December 10, 1964

These ancient/new assemblages that experiment with new practices of living and being together,  and the potential global compass of a new discourse of ‘belonging’ linked to a more than-human regional development imaginary is a relief to what we live with now.  It provides hope for a new paradigm of operating.  It gives breath to more of what matters than is currently acknowledged, in the markets and systems currently in place.  Both for health and well being, these sorts of changes are essential for putting into place justice and equality for the masses.

The world is changing.  Environmentally and health-wise it is not tenable for there to be the magnitude of inequities existent in the world (in this country), as there is.  Both the French and Russian Revolutions are historical indicators to this; the Occupy movement is a heads up in our own time.  The paralyzation of governments holding to this untenable way of operating, resistant to a more equitable shift of power, money and influence has only one cataclysmic outcome.

Friday, February 8, 2013

Trojan Wurst IV: Sustainable Protein

Like a lot of rational people, I've been on a sustained pause around definitive diets.  Diet methods and a lot of rigidity around whole foods in general always gets my "fake out" antenna up.  I've generally taken a judicious tact toward eating.  As vegetarianism, veganism and unrefined plant food (UPF) trends have been on the rise over the last couple of decades, I've been paying attention, reading the literature and increasing my vegetable intake accordingly.  I haven't given up meat, although I don't eat a lot of it.  I've been a little embarrassed to admit that killing animals for food is not in my mind, a horrific thing.  I've seen it (in my mind's eye) as part of a whole cycle.   But lately, I've had the occasion to see some films on sustainability and I am beginning to realize that what has been in my "mind's eye" has been an old-world European or 1950's image (an "old McDonald's farm" scenario, ei ei ohhh) on how farm animals are raised, treated and killed for consumption.  The worn denim overall'd grandpa chewing on a straw strand isn't out milking the three cows in the barn and wringing a few chicken necks for supper afterall.

There have been several concerns for me as of late around animal flesh.  A few years ago I happened to be visiting FDR's family vacation home in New Brunswick (charming and unostentagious by the way, worth a visit) and wandered down to the little beach on the bay where some fish farms were underway; salmon as a matter of fact, a fish I admire and esteem almost more than any other.  There was a whole description at the beach side as to how salmon farming is conducted, which by the time I finished reading, vowed never to eat farmed-raised fish again.  The methodology is so scientifically calculated it is kind of horrific.  Part of the wonder of salmon (reflected in their flesh) is their vital essential need as a species to do the incredible acrobatics that they need to do in order to spawn and survive.  They are remarkable beings.  These farms are science laboratories that in no way take in account the species essence, and that this essential aspect of the salmon, is contained in the flesh we eat.  It is not considered.  We are eating from an industrialized fishing industry.  The lack of consciousness around the food processing in this environment at a basic level (from cultivating fish eggs to harvesting fully grown fish) that produce our food sources is alarming.

The second cue which happened over the last year, has been practically subliminal for me.  I've had a sense the fish I have been eating is different than fish I was eating 5 or 7 years ago.  There's something not right about it, which I can't put my finger on and which would be easy to dismiss.  The flesh is different. The taste is not ---- alive?(missing the essence of the animal?) Not like it used to be. I've seen, tasted and known this about beef and chicken for over two decades.  One could parallel it to the difference between an organic egg you buy and the one your friend gives you from their chicken coop.  The difference isn't freshness so much (although I'm sure that's a factor), it's something else.  And I'm beginning to believe it's the way these animals who give their life for our benefit are treated prior to being killed.  We are living in a world of high technology, where exponential masses of animals are "processed" at enormous rates with shear brutality and in shockingly short periods of time. (A chicken is ready for slaughter now in 27 days as opposed to the 47 days it was ready decades ago, and weighing often twice as much in present day as in the past making them unable to stand up over their short life span.) There is a subtle but very serious lack of regard (completely discounted as being important at all) in this process, and which must effect what gets to our plate and into our bodies.

I think I've been able to assuage my alarm over the years around the animal flesh issue because I go primarily organic, free-range, "humanely treated", etc.  I've calmed myself thinking what I was buying and consuming was better.  But organic farms supplying Whole Foods and other supermarket chains conduct their food business practically the same way as the other producers.  Albeit, their chickens are given 3 feet of space a piece instead of being crammed into cages.  But they still discard the male chicks or grind them up for organic pet food since they won't be laying eggs.  "Organic" farms are also generally mass producers of food (3K-30,000 chickens harvested every month).  Organic beef suppliers also castrate the bulls, destroy cows who get utter infections instead of give them rest and antibiotics.  It evidently doesn't pay to appreciate what these animals provide to the masses.  No straw-chewing grandpa there.

King mushroom, grown in Maine, tons of protein!
This mindless approach to food production is of course due in large part to overpopulation.  The market must meet the demand.  According to the United Nation's Food and Agriculture Organization, raising animals for food on these huge scales is grossly inefficient and hugely polluting of the environment.  Raising livestock for consumption is a larger polluter than the transportation (cars, trucks) industry. How is this?  To raise cattle for consumption, an enormous amount of energy has to be expended to plant and grow the grain, irrigate it, harvest it, ship it and store it.  (For one pound of beef, it takes 6-10 pounds of grain; one cow drinks 50 gallons of water every day.) To keep cattle, bring them to slaughter, process, ship and store the butchered meat requires a further outlay of energy.  Consider cattle naturally put out large amounts of methane gas (which is 23 times more effective in trapping heat in the atmosphere than carbon dioxide--whala, global warming) and animal based protein releases much higher amounts of carbon dioxide than plant based protein.  Well, the benefits (and past pleasures) of animal protein begin to be outweighed by the little talked about sustainability downside.  The United Nations concern on climate change has irrefutably made the statement:  "Eat less Meat." It leaves a huge carbon footprint.  If the SAD (Standard American Diet) was replaced with a plant based diet by most people for a year, it would equal the energy saved if everyone drove a hybrid vehicle.  (The SAD diet by the way is 40% animal protein, 50% processed foods (anything in boxes, bottles or prepared), 3.5% unrefined plant food (greens!) and 3.5% starch (potatoes/grains).

Animal consumption is big business.  And big business tends to attract lobbyists and lean toward corruption practices.  Science and public policy around dairy for one, have people chairing committees on the Food and Nutrition Board (sets dietary guidelines) who are also consultants for the dairy industry (it is now recommended we drink 3 eight ounce glasses of milk daily up from two from a few years ago; any correlation?).  This is obviously a conflict of interest which seems to be under the law radar.

More fabulous Maine mushrooms!
As in healthcare, we are approaching the need for a paradigm shift in the way agriculture is grown in this country (but of course, there is a solid relationship between the two).  Obviously, we are not going back to becoming a non-industrialized agriculture society.  Too many people have to be fed.  But the trend to grow part of one's daily intake and use local small farmers for much of the rest is growing, a  more environmentally sustainable possibility for some of us.  It is almost convenient to buy local eggs now and raw milk from smaller farms.  CSAs have expanded to include humanely raised animals which families or individuals can buy a portion of the slaughter (still have to freeze the bulk of that portion, which is more energy use). Personally, I don't think the inhumane, mechanical processing of animal protein is good for my health and soul (or anyone elses?) or the environment.  We need to look at our consumer and eating habits with this in mind, bring more consciousness to the way we purchase, grow and sustain ourselves.  Saying NO to the technology-based food production in this country will in time shift the paradigm (and everything else) on how we feed ourselves and respect the action of self sustenance and planet sustainability.  If we don't do this, but continue to consume food in America the way we do, according to experts, by 2030 we will need 2-5 other planets to feed all of us.  This is 2013, 16 years to go.  Earth is all we've got (at the moment).

resources gleaned from:

Food, Inc - TakePart

Vegeducated - New release on Netflix - Vegan Lifestyle - The Chat .

Forks Over Knives | Official Website

 

 

Monday, December 17, 2012

Modern Love

It is not my habit to write about the latest sensational news.But lately, from widely different sources, essays, articles and impressions have been finding there way to me and I feel compelled to comment. The recent tragedy in Connecticut (close to my original home for decades) and its most probable link to unrecognized mental illness belay the lack of support for those suffering with mental illness (and their families) and also puts a perspective on the struggles and turning away our culture (government, insurance companies, "systems") does to ignore or deny these very real issues (which inevitably impact the general population as we saw in the Newtown, Connecticut horror). Essays such as the one on unusual Bronx nurses in public health battling with keeping teen mothers and their baby's heads above financial water and conditions absolutely stacked against any sense of wellness; psychiatrically tender college freshmen far from home requiring all sorts of professional support when overwhelm sets in.
The often tenuous mental/spirit challenged live in rough seas; those with financial resources and savvy know-how usually are able to navigate their needs successfully, while still bearing the difficulty of "otherness" which autism spectrum, development delays, mentally challenged and psych disorders reliably guarantee even under the best circumstances.  For those in any type of marginal economic situation, it is a catastrophe, as well as for those who love and take responsibility for them.  Perhaps, now we are a nation that is becoming more comfortable with otherness (legal gay marriage, persons of color in major public office, legalized recreational drug use); perhaps it is time we take on the pink elephant in the room, mental health and it's inclusion into general society, it's recognition, compassionate acceptance and a commitment toward an economic support for those struggling with it.
It is a good example what many households go through.  Terror, shame, confusion--- and mostly suffered in total isolation and invisibility. Our cultural system constructs can't acknowledge or begin to effectively deal with the Pandora's Box which is this area of healthcare. Tara Ebrahimi, wrote a recent article in the NY Times Sunday Please read this.  It's incredibly touching, a story I've seen a facsimile of time and time again working with people facing medical and mental hurdles.  A loved-one begins to decline, help is sought (over months and years) from all the right avenues and agencies (repeatedly), is not obtained despite jumping through an incredible amount of bureaucratic hoops and a family is left emotionally and financially depleted without the inner or outer resources to deal with an often impossible situation related to physical/mental/psych challenges. This courageous, loyal and loving woman finally with no other recourse, took matters into her own hands without knowing what to do, decided to Be with her brother.  She made relationship because it was the only thing to do, her only resource left. As was apparent, relationship was the thing lacking in all these other constant efforts with un-relatable In this world where it seems these challenges are exponentially increasing in incidence (ie: autism has increased to 1 in 88 births, a 1,148% growth rate), we are seeing three things: more basic life challenges for many more people, a culture and system that continues to deny not only the problem but the impact on the culture at large and we are seeing people (family members and loved ones) forced into a sensitization of self and other (such as Ebrahimi). These are people who have gone into the fire's crucible and survived with more patience, compassion, and a finely tuned depth of perception and awareness. I hesitate to call them saints; maybe invisible neighborhood prophets. They've got a world view worth proselytizing. They should be our future leaders.  They have lived the terrifying fringe, rarely have bitterness and only gratitude for the cauterizing hell they and their loved ones have been through. In them, a wisdom, understanding, moxy/chutzpah/grit has been crystallized. There is an authentic absence of greed, avarice and narcissism we are woefully needing in our public leaders today. At least in tandem with the gun control issue, if not before, the concept of Oneness needs to be addressed in this country. Relationship. Being. Being with and for, within and without. We should be looking at these courageous, loving relatives that take the monolithic Goliath systems on out of fierce devotion. We should be looking at those who have these illnesses and "otherness-es", who struggle day in and day out, who are feared for their otherness, disrespected and made invisible.  They are part of the oneness we all are living. They are our sons and mothers. They are an unrecognized brilliant facet of our whole.  We are a collective, we need to care, to include them, not shut them out. They, like we, are here for a reason, they have their part. As long as we look to blame guns (or on the other side's belief system, lack of personally held firearms), we need to look at the failure of us as a culture not taking responsibility for each other, the (community) illnesses suffered, the isolation and marginalization of our neighbors.

Friday, December 7, 2012

Belief

Sometimes we remember singular, stick-to-your-bones things about an endeavor.  One of the stand-out learning modules in my MA program in Integrative Health and Healing at
I've seen this in training new nurses in regards to having them learn to open their energy field, creating a more spacious sense of awareness and sensitizing themselves to what is in the moment.  They do this and then often become prey to the hostile or negative because although they've practiced grounding and centering before, they've not practiced both at the same time.  They lose one or the other in trying to strengthen one or the other.  And so it is with us.  We are so in the habit of forming belief, attaching to something, anything to identify ourselves, we forget our feet on the floor, the sense of breath moving through our bodies.  In particular in the "knowing" professions like medicine, it is supremely uncomfortable to entertain the unknown; we're indoctrinated to know (or pretend we know) lest there be any errors.  Most ER, critical care nurses hate this relaxation, sensitizing I do with them.  They feel they can't "be on their game" if they're all relaxed. And they are (partially) right, they can't if they don't value the (sometimes appearing opposite) sense of being grounded, which isn't in their automatic reactions (valuable in their own right) but present in the discriminating (more present) self who is practicing letting go of tensions while centering energies in the body.  They often, without knowing it while in the ER capacity, have attached to the high they get from the hormones released from the sympathetic nervous system (adrenalin primarily) and the subsequent sense of being almost omnipotent.  It can be hard to give that up and hard not to believe the cascade of self-importance felt and one's elevated capacity. Lack and Unknown are not of the ego's world (unless the ego has been trained to live there).  Most of us need to get trained to co-exist with them, as our human upbringing in culture hasn't provided that.  Someone in us needs to "believe", to value this other reality.  Otherwise, all our beliefs are entrenched in something ego feeds off of, creating attitudes, habits, addictions most of me will gladly tolerate, narrowing my world exponentially.  I have to want a different reality

Monday, October 22, 2012

The Arts and Health

For many people, accepting the undeniable relationship between a non-toxic environment to good health is pretty easy.  Without clean air and water, nutritious food, the possibility of good health is questionable.  People are unlikely to argue there is no relationship between these two factors  But to make a parallel between robust Arts engagement in a culture and good health is a bigger leap.  Why is this?  Primarily, the Arts in schools and in a culture are considered a "frill" or negligible.  In a world straining to make greater in-roads on science and math (an admitted well-paved bridge to health), the Arts are considered a superficial entertainment or past time.  I want to challenge this.

I recently attended a dinner party where the subject of government forgiveness of student loans came up.  One person suggested young people who had acquired science and math degrees should have their loans forgiven, as their skill sets would be necessary for the competitive economic future of the country.  The inevitable, "What about the kids with photography degrees?" point was played and the answer was, "We don't need more photographers, they're a dime a dozen.  Liberal/fine arts majors should have thought to have gotten a more useful, sensible degree."

"Art doesn't transform. It just plain forms."--Roy Lichtenstein

For those of us who have explored our creativity through our lifetime, survived high school and young adulthood because of the open art classroom, patiently learned the beguiling centering process on a potter's wheel,  or experimented with fascination the technological edges of photography as a  medium because we were so entirely bored with rote learning-- words like that diner's, well they are an ignorant, demeaning and dangerous insinuation, a dagger to the heart (if I may be allowed some dramatic license) to what makes people human.  For those who have sacrificed financial gain in a greed-centric culture, committing to be an artist, often at a great cost, or for those who have played with music or poetry-making on weekends to maintain their mental health, the arts are an imperative need for the feeding of Spirit, part of the process of an entire culture's evolution and yes, our health.

A physiotherapist I know has made the possibly edgy statement that all people no matter what condition their bodies are in, are athletes.  So it is also, all people are artists.  Some might not be able to draw realistically, or have a great spatial sense, nonetheless they/we are all  artists because we all are beings of spirit.  All human beings have this major aspect of Spirit embedded in themselves.  We come pre-loaded.  If this is not explored in one way or other, if our creativity is not employed in our lives, we become less, and what animates us is at risk.  This is health.  It is a sublime and often invisible reality each of us lives. It should never be discounted or marginalized, as that diner (and probably so many other 'practical' others) would have us do.  Creativity is a commodity. The arts ultimately determine the success of a culture (the beauty, peace and questioning manifested).

The creative in oneself gives the subtle aspects of ourselves room.  Seeing a play, going to a concert, watching exquisitely trained dancers on a stage provides us with a spacious experience, broadens an often shut-down, or at the very least, limited perspective.  The vitality of expression resonates with one's spirit vitality.  Energetically, vibration is transferred, exchanged; we are renewed, replenished.  Is this not health?  Is there not a direct correlation to one's health and creative exploration?

"I do not want ART for a few any more than education for a few, or freedom for a few."  
William Morris 


Which brings us to the Right brain/Left brain aspect of ourselves.  For most of us, one hemisphere of our brains is dominant over the other. "Left-brained" is often said to be more logical, analytical and objective, while a person who is "right-brained" is said to be more intuitive, thoughtful and subjective. Science has shown, when both halves of the brain work together math skills are actually strongest.  We have this entire physiology to use, appreciate and honor.

My points above about art are not so much about differences in "brain-ness", but about fulfilling spirit in our lives, an important part of our physiology that is under the radar, but which impacts our actions, our mental well being, our health. It is my sense that the diner who failed to appreciate arts expression (or education) isn't so much left brained, but weak in a more spacious thinking capacity, someone who hasn't had the good fortune of a broad(minded) education (something a good liberal arts education would have given him).  I recall once watching a completely alive three year old for over 45 minutes as she explored with a limitless, nimble imagination, her world.  Talking to herself, she being the main character in a story she was deeply evolving, jumping up participating in a hand sewing endeavor for awhile, rolling out of that to put marker to page, drawing connections.  What a learning!  What a way to discover the world and herself!  Of course, creative play is more acceptable for children, than it is for adults.  But that is a culture more; exploring creativity is essential in every part of one's life continuum.  Seeing "brain-ness" as a complete package rather than a positive or negative (depending on propensity) is an inclusive, non-violent acceptance of the whole of me.


"I am enough of an artist to draw freely upon my imagination. Imagination is more important than knowledge. Knowledge is limited. Imagination encircles the world." -- Albert Einstein

Wednesday, October 17, 2012

Prodigal Return: Community of Self

We are all Prodigal Sons (and Daughters).  We get lost, we run away, we dismiss and disappear.  We separate from our (internal) beloveds, waste our resources and stray from goodness.  Goodness we have inhabited and goodness being extended to us.  We turn away. And we turn away again.  The letting go is cloaked, the truth of it masked. Until the day we come back "home"; stripped, beaten and humbled.  And we are faced with open arms by those internal parts of ourselves that have missed us, longed to be all together, wishing to be whole again.

Homecoming begins when we start paying attention to the tug of "home".  The collective beloved's voice is heard, calling for us to return, a momentary distraction from the familiar turning away.  It's not the voice of guilt or shame or outer authority that hounds and interjects repeatedly on the sojourn, but the "real-deal" voice.  The real-deal voice of the collective beloved having qualities that aren't etched in despair and judgement.  The voice is usually small, quiet and direct; it's heartfelt, not critical  Most of all the voice is patient; its had to be, it's been drowned out and silenced for lengthy periods of time, repeatedly.

photo: Elliott Erwitt
How does that part stay within, stay alive with all the frequent internal abandonment that goes on?  Possibly, that part is of a larger community.  As Lee van Laer (Zen, Yoga, Gurdjieff- perspectives on inner work)  aptly says: "Everything actually begins in/ends in community. The perception of isolation is essentially egoistic. God/Dharma are all-inclusive; we simply don't sense it. Born together, we die together... there isn't any separation except the separation we impose on ourselves."

It would seem we don't have a sense of this community in ourselves because we don't often have a modicum of relaxation present in our collective parts; body, mind and spirit.  We are desensitized by stress and overstimulation.  That voice of home calling us to return requires a sensitization, a regular state of relaxation for us to hear it and for us to return to it.  The community of self needs awareness and some attention to be activated.

van Laer indicates the community of Oneness, the Collective is itself singular. The Community's "parts simply sense themselves as individuals because the individuality that births the community is at a higher level... unknowable. Essential."  This statement resonates with the idea we are a rippling microcosmos of the great macrocosmos.  Our physiologies reflect this.  Our varied self-ecosystems also reflect this.  It would seem the separation our humanness insists upon, whether it be in the prodigal state or condition of prejudice, fails to recognize or experience the relationship.  Oneness, Self Community is both singular and not, much like the universe is single and also comprised of star/planet systems.  This "likeness" (another ring in the ripple of the Eternal, of the Oneness) is in, on and within all layers of everything.  With all this relatedness everywhere, the Community of the Self and otherwise so manifested, it's kind of astounding there is ever a sense of being prodigal at all.  Which brings us to the notion of illusion in what I call (my) reality.  If there is all this relatedness present, how is it one could ever think or act differently from that truth?  What is the illusion in my reality that fails to recognize the relatedness to myself, others and the world at large?  that fails to know the community of self?